Only the most frequent Internet users are familiar with the Facebook network. Highly likely that many of their members stick the cry to heaven when they learn of the dark purpose behind the most popular Web site among the gringos from 17 to 25 years.
This virtual company that has achieved full market penetration university in the United States of America, where they are registered eight of every ten students. Vale
ask, how Facebook's growth has quadrupled over the last year and receives an average of 250 000 new members every day, although the services offered are free? Where-
must ask with good dose of suspicion, obtains the resources to respond Facebook 58 million active members who post on average 14 million photos a day and to date have hung around 2,700 million images?
Hard to even imagine the monumental size of your computer and the high cost of technology and not to mention the huge payroll that is required to host and manage the huge number of users.
When one digests the astronomical figures surrounding Facebook, no one can speculate that a company which giant Microsoft valued at 15,000 million dollars will be financed exclusively by advertising. The experts in the field assume that because of taxes, the government monitors gringo large firms with eagle eye, which flatly rule out a possible money laundering or other type of banditry.
So how the hell are they doing? The answer reveals Ari Melber, a member of the 2004 presidential campaign of John Kerry: Facebook is selling user information to the highest bidder "What many users do not know is that according to contract terms that assume virtually clicking in Table I agree, the Facebook users to give exclusive and perpetual property of all information and images published. "
In fact, highlight the expert, that Facebook members will automatically authorize the perpetual and transferable, with the rights of distribution or public display of all that hung on their website. Terms of Use will reserve Facebook the right to grant and sublicense all user content to other businesses.
Without their consent, many users turned their pictures in advertising, becoming a private business in public endorsements.
Suddenly everything published its affiliates, including their personal photos, his political inclination, the state of their relationships, and individual interests to the address of the house, was sent without your express permission to thousands of users.
In the U.S., the fact that John Smith rented the movie Brokeback Mountain and Petra Lopez bought baby clothes is not so innocent when you throw the first from school for their possible homosexual inclinations and the second is fired on suspicion of employment is pregnant.
have to believe Mr. Melber when he says that many employers gringos when evaluating Facebook reviewing resumes for intimate knowledge of the applicants.
test a page on Facebook is not private at all evident in a famous case where John Brown University expelled a student when he discovered a photograph that hung on Facebook dressed transvestite. Other evidence came when a Secret Service agent visited the University of Oklahoma sophomore Saul Martinez for a comment he posted against the president. And to top
worse, it does not stop if the user decides to withdraw. Even when users cancel the membership, photos and information remain on board, according to Facebook, in case you decide to reactivate your account. Moreover, the user is not removed or even when you die.
According to the terms of use "the mourners can not compel Facebook pick the data and images of their loved ones, as when the deceased took the virtual contract awarded Facebook the right to keep it active under a special status commemoration a period of time determined by us to allow other users to post and see comments about the deceased "Know Facebook users, which are participants in a scenario defenseless some researchers describe as the largest espionage case in the history of mankind. By the way we unconsciously become the precursors of the phenomenon of "Big Brother is watching you." Direct reference to the abuse of state interference in private affairs of ordinary people to control social behavior.
0 comments:
Post a Comment