received this information and believe it is necessary to publish it, because expressed in these lines which some denounce openly, others defend and justify in blind condescension, and many more known and discussed in a low voice ...
In my opinion, is correct in its assessment, but failed the DESERT final desicion ... the movie would be perfect in this situation. Silence is better than the ridiculous ...
CONACINE FILM COMMUNITY INFORMA
then forwards them to the Final Act II Post Contest Final Act Competition and Distribution II.
SECOND SPECIAL CONTEST
POST-PRODUCTION FOR WORKS
CINEMATOGRAPHIC PERUVIAN
FEATURE
- CONACINE 2010
Legal Base: Law and Regulation Film 26370 DS-ED 42-95
Call and Contest Rules of the Second Extraordinary Post-Production for Film Works Peruvian Feature Film - 2010
CONACINE JURY FINAL MINUTES
We surprised and regret the poor quality in all aspects of the projects presented, having found a lack of creativity, poor development of the narrative, dashes little work (especially texts and dialogues), lack of use of film language and poor directing actors. However, as a matter of conscience that would declare the prize void, as the Peruvian film has so little support and promotion, is that we choose to reward the two projects less lacking in these aspects and come closest to being a film.
1. Corner of the Innocents, produced by the company Andina SRL Film Company and directed by Palito Ortega Matute
Despite having a fairly simple treatment. We believe it is a difficult issue to address and restore the proposal of a provincial director who shows a personal world view and of the acts of someone who lived in the place of events.
found valid confront the viewer Lima en su mayoría migrante, frente a una película filmada en provincia. Al mismo tiempo es rescatable que el director en esta película se enfrente a unas condiciones de producción más cercanas a las convencionales y menos alternativas que en sus anteriores producciones.
2. Bolero de Noche, de la empresa productora La Soga Producciones E.I.R.L. y dirigida por Eduardo Mendoza De Echave
Siendo una película de fórmula facilista y estereotipada, cumple con los mínimos niveles técnicos required cinematographic language, photography and editing. Despite having a gap and inequality in the direction of actors, rescued the knowledge of the language of film director. Therefore, we decided to support him to complete his process.
Considering the work presented in this and previous contest, the jury, want to suggest to CONACINE, that the contest post production requirements are included as technical issues, or to appoint a Technical Committee filter the projects that are unpresentable.
MARTA MENDEZ ITURRIAGA
Jury President
DNI 10710233
MICAELA Cajahuaringa SCHREIBER
DNI 07562460
CARLA LEVI
VELAZQUEZ DNI 09336907
0 comments:
Post a Comment